Donna Davis of Scranton, Pa. Nearly everyone believes that persons have a special moral status: Taking the life of another person, barring extreme circumstances, is a grievous sin. Most pro-choicers subscribe to that view—but not at all.
Poli Sci prof IR at U. According to Belvedere, it is impossible to believe that abortion is immoral and that it should be legal. If you missed Part II, check it out here: Abortion, unjustified killing, and overridingnessarcdigital.
Otherwise, the autonomy of the pregnant woman would be a prevailing moral concern.
The most common way to make this moral judgment is equating abortion to murder. Violating individual autonomy is wrong and murder is wrong. Most would agree that murder is worse though that becomes a more difficult question when the violation of autonomy is chattel slavery. The argument for legally prohibiting abortion relies on the widely accepted notion that the state should legally prohibit murder.
The common method of equating abortion and murder is known as personhood.
Essentially, a fetus is a person just like a child or an adult. All three, as persons, have equal moral value. And since ending the life of a person is wrong, ending the life of a fetus is wrong.
In Part I of this series, Belvedere, citing Don Marquis, tries to get around the assumption of personhood by arguing that, even if we assume a fetus is not a person, abortion is still as wrong as murder.
Marquis argues that murdering someone is wrong because it deprives them of future value. Since a fetus also has future value, depriving it of that value via abortion is morally equivalent to murder.
This strikes me as a semantic hand-wave.
A case for the irrelevance of personhoodarcdigital. Therefore, abortion is as immoral as murder and, just like murder, should be outlawed. Therefore, forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy to term against her will is immoral, and abortion should be legal.
Most everyone agrees that murder is wrong and that violating individual autonomy is wrong. In other words, you take it on faith. They might not even be the most common. And with different bedrock beliefs, one can make a logical argument that abortion is morally wrong and should still be legal: The fetus is simultaneously part of the pregnant woman and a separate entity.
They are at once together and separate. A fetus has moral value, but less moral value than a person.Nov 13, · The Morality of Abortion Essay examples Words | 6 Pages The Morality of Abortion Abortion is the termination of a foetus whilst in the womb and .
The issue of abortion hinges on the question of personhood. Nearly everyone believes that persons have a special moral status: Taking the life of another person, barring extreme circumstances, is.
The Morality of Abortion Abortion is the termination of a foetus whilst in the womb and is a constantly argued issue in today's society.
Whether abortion is moral or immoral depends on many topics and on one particular topic; when does life start? The Morality of Abortion: Practically Proven abortion is morally justified, there are also just the sovereign principles and ideals that this country and humans in general are based upon that render abortion as being far from immoral.5/5(6).
As the fetus gains moral value, the gap between its value and the moral value of the pregnant woman’s autonomy shrinks. This means an abortion in the first trimester is an easier decision from a moral perspective than one in the third.
Abortion- The Controversy on Morality Abortion’s legalization through Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade, has allowed for one in three pregnancies to end in abortion.