October 16, Highlights of This Issue These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
Press release A more recent version of this report is available at epi. What this report finds: Income inequality has risen in every state since the s and in many states is up in the post—Great Recession era.
In 24 states, the top 1 percent captured at least half of all income growth between andand in 15 of those states, the top 1 percent captured all income growth. In another 10 states, top 1 percent incomes grew in the double digits, while bottom 99 percent incomes fell. For the United States overall, the top 1 percent captured In the top 1 percent of families nationally made Rising inequality is not just a story of those in the financial sector in the greater New York City metropolitan area reaping outsized rewards from speculation in financial markets.
While New York and Connecticut are the most unequal states as measured by the ratio of top 1 percent to bottom 99 percent income innine states, 54 metropolitan areas, and counties have gaps wider than the national gap. Explore inequality by state, county, and metro area in this interactive feature.
What we can do to fix the problem: The rise of top incomes relative to the bottom 99 percent represents a sharp reversal of the trend that prevailed in the midth century. Between andthe share of income held by the top 1 percent declined in every state except Alaska where the top 1 percent held a relatively low share of income throughout the period.
This earlier era was characterized by a rising minimum wage, low levels of unemployment after the s, widespread collective bargaining in private industries manufacturing, transportation [trucking, airlines, and railroads], telecommunications, and constructionand a cultural and political environment in which it was outrageous for executives to receive outsized bonuses while laying off workers.
We need policies that return the economy to full employment, return bargaining power to U. Executive summary While economic inequality has been one of the hottest topics this presidential campaign season, much of the focus has been on the fortunes of the top 1 percent at the national level.
This report, our third annual such analysis, uses the latest available data to examine how the top 1 percent in each state have fared over —, with an emphasis on trends over — This third edition includes two new elements: We examine top incomes by metropolitan area and county in Our analysis provides a number of major findings that confirm the widespread extent and growth of income inequality that is heightening economic anxiety among the American electorate: Inincome inequality was much higher in many states, metropolitan areas, and counties than for the United States overall.
Nine states had gaps wider than the national gap. In the most unequal states—New York, Connecticut, and Wyoming—the top 1 percent earned average incomes more than 40 times those of the bottom 99 percent.
Fifty-four of metropolitan areas had gaps wider than the national gap. In the 12 most unequal metropolitan areas, the average income of the top 1 percent was at least 40 times greater than the average income of the bottom 99 percent. Most unequal was the Jackson metropolitan area, which spans Wyoming and Idaho; there the top 1 percent in earned on average times the average income of the bottom 99 percent of families.
The average income of the top 1 percent was at least 45 times greater than the average income of the bottom 99 percent in 25 counties. In Teton, Wyoming which is one of two counties in the Jackson metropolitan areathe top 1 percent in earned on average times the average income of the bottom 99 percent of families.
There is a wide variance in what it means to be in the top 1 percent by state, metro area, and county. Twelve states, metro areas, and counties have thresholds above that level.
While incomes at all levels declined as a result of the Great Recession, income growth has been lopsided since the recovery began in ; the top 1 percent captured an alarming share of economic growth while enjoying relatively high income growth.
Between andthe top 1 percent captured Over this period, the average income of the top 1 percent grew In 24 states the top 1 percent captured at least half of all income growth between and In 15 of those states the top 1 percent captured all income growth between and In the other nine states, the top 1 percent captured between In 10 states, top 1 percent incomes grew in the double digits, while bottom 99 percent incomes fell.
Those states were Wyoming Stokes, NC has a population of people with a median age of and a median household income of N/A. Between and the population of Stokes, NC grew from to , a 82% increase and its median household income N/A from N/A to N/A, a N/A N/A.
The Constitution: An Introduction [Michael Stokes Paulsen, Luke Paulsen] on benjaminpohle.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. From war powers to health care, freedom of speech to gun ownership, religious liberty to abortion.
Sheikha Mozah Bint Nasser Al-Missned on Forbes. Amid the renewed hope and progress of Qatar's recovering economy, the emir's glamorous second of three wives, Sheikha Mozah is pressing ahead with.
The fund aims to provide a total return (the combination of income and growth of capital) to investors based on exposure to optimal income streams in inves. Nike picks a side in America’s culture wars Five surprising outcomes of the financial crisis The next financial crisis won’t come from a ‘known unknown’.
Medford Township highlighted in Burlington County. Inset map: Burlington County highlighted in the State of New Jersey.
Census Bureau map of Medford .